(1.5 inch)^3 has units of length^3 Google answered 55.306341 milliliters Rather than treating each word problem separately just do the whole thing, consistently and coordinate with all search engines and sites so it is not “everyone doing their own thing) (1.5*2.54 cm)^3 = 5.5306341E-5 meter^3 — for (1.5 inch)^3 in meter^3 they refer to a
Read More »
Passion Without Guidance. My first year of high school was 1963/64 at Eau Gallie High School just across the bay from Cape Canaveral where my Dad was working. Kennedy gave his moon speech at Rice University on 12 Sep 1962. Within a few months, my Dad left his old job in Texas and moved our
Read More »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnCmvxt2jn8 I try to read and review internet content of all kinds. When I see people wasting time, it bothers me. When millions of people waste time it is bad. When billions waste years each, a catastrophe. The properties of air and electrical circuits are well known. Air is about 2.5 Kilogram/Meter^3 and molar mass
Read More »
https://www.masterwiresupply.com/ I bought 100 foot (30.48 Meters) of your 28 Gauge Nichrome 80 wire from Amazon and was looking for properties and specifications for a lab experiment. 6 ohms per foot at “room temperature” is 6*(1000/(12*25.4)) = 19.6850393701 Ohms/Meter. The class is always in SI units and always carry full precise to verify long chains
Read More »
Chad, I found the spectral sensitivity of the CS135MUN camera. I am looking out past 2,000 nm = 2 um (below 1500 Kelvin, below 85 THz) https://www.thorlabs.com/images/tabimages/CS135MUN_Quantum_Efficiency_G1-780.gif https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/wiens-law I also found your ThorLabs repositories on GitHub, but probably not sufficient for what I need. https://github.com/Thorlabs Do you make your own images sensors, or use ones
Read More »
Atoms and particles bind by magnetic dipole and higher magnetic multipoles when they are very close. Classical electrodynamics is a convenient way to get rough estimates when doing chemistry inside and near the nucleus and particles. But since stars and planets have magnetic dipoles, the 1/r^3 magnetic energy comes into play. So there should
Read More »
Donnie Mason, I was just enjoying the graphs and data at NuDat 3.0. I have been reading and using table of isotopes for over 50 years. It is finally getting to where it is easy to use. I was looking at Q beta-, Q beta+ and Q EC for all the isotopes and the CSVs
Read More »
H C Verma Course: HC Verma-Magnetic field a consequence of relativity in hindi at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMHbdyJDL1I New: This is a good result, but it needs to be in the computer as an engineering model. Not long algebra on a blackboard. Old: H C Verma, You are perpetuating a population of humans in a country that relies only
Read More »
Cool Worlds Podcast: #4 Hod Lipson – Automated Physics Discovery, ChatGPT, Future of AI at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KT7gAYmnOhI Hod Lipson, If you take a time series and its first and second differences, the systems where “velocity” and “acceleration” work are the ones where the second difference, “acceleration” is normally distributed. For 25 years, I have checked all the
Read More »
The Slow Mo Guys: Ridiculous Magnets Colliding at 187,000FPS – The Slow Mo Guys at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHPtuEfMPTc Slow Mo Guys, you can do the same with protons, electrons, positrons, anti-protons, any particle with a permanent magnetic dipole moment. You have to line up the spins properly, and time them using magnetic resonant imaging methods. But it can
Read More »