Related: A desktop photo scanner can get 6400 dots per inch over 8.5*11 inches. That is 3.82976\u00a0 GigaPixels with 32 bit colors.<\/p>\n
See also: PetaPixelProject.com with many 10 to 100 GigaPixel images. They use “Atlas Browser Based Viewer” that seems to work.\u00a0 I am not recommending it, just noting they seem to be able to show large lossless? images fairly readily.<\/p>\n
“GigaPixel” on Google search has 930,000 entry points – a fairly mature topic. “PetaPixel” is mostly commercial now, but I see “2.2 Gigapixel photo”. For the Internet, I want consistency and ease of use for 4.8 Billion users if they want to do science, not pretty pictures.<\/p>\n
Go down a ways and there is a 24113*23588*3 lossless image of Titan PIA17655 “Titans North Full Resolution” at <\/span>https:\/\/<\/span>photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov\/target\/titan<\/a> That is 568.777444 MegaPx. People do share useful forms, but most web images use lossy formats. What is ExaScale for, if not to share real data?<\/span><\/p>\n Oh, I get your point. Twitter itself won’t store much. But that does not prevent anyone from sharing by link. I felt obligated to learn what Twitter is doing, can do, and ought to do. Nice work you are doing!! I think Internet sharing should be lossless.<\/p>\n Here is a 10848*10848 image in jpeg, so almost completely useless. That is 117,679,104 or 117.679 MegaPixels. And the same image in GeoTiff (lossless). <\/span>https:\/\/<\/span>star.nesdis.noaa.gov\/GOES\/fulldisk.php?sat=G16<\/span>\u2026<\/span><\/a> Just need a link to a file.<\/span><\/p>\n Yes, there are lossless formats offered. But you gave a lossy format first and that is the one probably copied, that ends up all over the Internet. Thank you the beautiful image, but more thank you for the beautiful data.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Related: A desktop photo scanner can get 6400 dots per inch over 8.5*11 inches. That is 3.82976\u00a0 GigaPixels with 32 bit colors. See also: PetaPixelProject.com with many 10 to 100 GigaPixel images. They use “Atlas Browser Based Viewer” that seems to work.\u00a0 I am not recommending it, just noting they seem to be able to
Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,20,26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2164","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-all-sky-cameras","category-collaborative-model-and-data","category-web-policies-internet-polices"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2164","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2164"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2164\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2168,"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2164\/revisions\/2168"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2164"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2164"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2164"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}